Welcome Guest! You need to login or register to make posts.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
photo_tom  
#1 Posted : Monday, April 26, 2004 3:04:00 AM(UTC)
photo_tom

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/27/2003(UTC)
Posts: 29

I have a system running Windows 98 (not SE) and IE5 and Uploader V2 does not run in this configuration. Is there something that I should be doing? Addaitionally, system has very litttle RAM. Could this cause a problem?

Tom Thorp
Still waters, great photos
Fedor  
#2 Posted : Monday, April 26, 2004 3:30:00 AM(UTC)
Fedor

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member, Administration, Moderator
Joined: 7/28/2003(UTC)
Posts: 1,508

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 48 post(s)
We confirm the problem with Windows 98 in some configurations. In 1-2 days we will release Image Uploader 2.1 which will fix this and others problems.
Best regards,
Fedor Skvortsov
Fedor  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, April 27, 2004 11:25:00 PM(UTC)
Fedor

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member, Administration, Moderator
Joined: 7/28/2003(UTC)
Posts: 1,508

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 48 post(s)
We have released Image Uploader 2.1 where this problem is fixed.

View post for more info.
Best regards,
Fedor Skvortsov
photo_tom  
#4 Posted : Thursday, April 29, 2004 10:40:00 PM(UTC)
photo_tom

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/27/2003(UTC)
Posts: 29

New version is a significant improvement over 2.0. Thanks for effort.

However, we have a disalup machine runing windows 98 (not 98SE) and IE5.5 and still will not run uploader. As they are a very, very small group of users, we send them to an alternate upload screen using conventional HTML File upload controls.

Suggestion for future improvement.

Our application we only upload downsized thumbnails of file to upload. It taks 2-4 seconds to process thumbnails for uploading in our application, would it be possible to put the processing for the next file in a background thread that executes while uploading and waiting for response from the current file? Especially on slower machines this could reduce upload time alot. This is a low priority request, but would be nice

Keep up good work. Your coders really know their stuff.
Tom Thorp
Still waters, great photos
Andrew  
#5 Posted : Thursday, April 29, 2004 11:01:00 PM(UTC)
Andrew

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member, Administration
Joined: 8/2/2003(UTC)
Posts: 863

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 25 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Thank you for your words. Our developers are really pleased with them. :)

As for your request, the idea is very interesting. It is feasible for one-by-one upload only (because we need fully generate HTTP POST request before starting upload, so we cannot do it asynchronously for one-time upload). While some file is uploading, we could generate next POST request...

Thank you for your idea, it is possible we will implement this feature in further versions.
Fedor  
#6 Posted : Monday, May 31, 2004 4:11:00 PM(UTC)
Fedor

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member, Administration, Moderator
Joined: 7/28/2003(UTC)
Posts: 1,508

Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 48 post(s)
The problem with Windows 98 was fixed in version 2.5.0.2:

View post
Best regards,
Fedor Skvortsov
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.