Rank: Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 12/22/2006(UTC)
Posts: 13
|
Hi again, Also read: this topicAfter my images are uploaded, my images are serious bad in quality. After the uploadprocess the image has been changed a lot in quality. My parameters are: Code:
//Midden formaat
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2FitMode", "Fit");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2JpegQuality", "100");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2ResizeQuality", "High");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2Width", "594");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2Height", "480");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2CopyExif", "False");
// Thumbnail formaat
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3FitMode", "Fit");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3JpegQuality", "100");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3ResizeQuality", "High");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3Width", "150");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3Height", "113");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3CopyExif", "False");
This are the results: Small image:[Image was removed] Big image:[Image was removed] Is there any way to fix this 'qualitybug'? Parameters or anything else? Thnx. - Frank Weima EDIT 1: It has nothing to do with the watermark image. I removed the watermark-script, but nothing seemed to change in quality. Edited by user Friday, December 18, 2009 8:22:07 PM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member, Administration, Moderator
Joined: 9/19/2006(UTC)
Posts: 505
Was thanked: 41 time(s) in 41 post(s)
|
Hi, It’s difficult to say anything about quality from above-mentioned parameters. Try to use different resize quality with the same thumbnail size, for example: Code:
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2FitMode", "Fit");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2JpegQuality", "100");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2ResizeQuality", "High");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2Width", "594"); // 150
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2Height", "480"); // 113
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2CopyExif", "False");
//
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3FitMode", "Fit");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3JpegQuality", "100");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3ResizeQuality", "Medium");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3Width", "594"); //150
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3Height", "480"); // 113
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3CopyExif", "False");
There must be a difference between thumbnail2 and thumbnail3. If there is no difference, please, give us more information: IU version, OS and browser. Edited by user Monday, February 25, 2008 4:34:51 PM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
Best regards,
Eugene Kosmin
The Aurigma Development Team
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 12/22/2006(UTC)
Posts: 13
|
Okay, I tried to play with the 'UploadThumbnailXResizeQuality' - High, Medium, Low, but without any success. Also, the imagewidth and height didn't do anything better.
OS : Windows Vista HOME Premium
Browser: Internet Explorer 7.0.6000
IU: 4.1 (April latest release, from Aurigma.com)
I have to put my website online today, so I havn't got any choise than offer them the 'bit lower'-quality files. I hope that it'll fix soon :)
Any ideas?
Thanks for your help, in any way!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member, Administration, Moderator
Joined: 9/19/2006(UTC)
Posts: 505
Was thanked: 41 time(s) in 41 post(s)
|
That’s an issue. Resize Quality feature wasn’t included in IU 4.1.60. It will be available in IU 4.5. Thank you for a bug report. Edited by user Friday, February 22, 2008 3:52:17 PM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
Best regards,
Eugene Kosmin
The Aurigma Development Team
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.