Aurigma Forums
»
Legacy Products
»
Archive
»
Image Uploader
»
Does anybody know why files are compressed more in Java vs. ActiveX
Rank: Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/4/2007(UTC)
Posts: 4
|
We are using the same settings for the dual uploader and can't figure out why files are being compressed more in the Java platform vs. the Active X platform. Any help is much appreciated! :) Code://Configure thumbnail settings.
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail1FitMode", "Fit");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail1Width", "195");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail1Height", "195");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail1JpegQuality", "60");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail1CopyExif", "true");
//Configure thumbnail settings.
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2FitMode", "Fit");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2Width", "630");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2Height", "630");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2JpegQuality", "70");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail2CopyExif", "true");
//Configure thumbnail settings.
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3FitMode", "Fit");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3Width", "960");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3Height", "640");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3JpegQuality", "90");
iu.addParam("UploadThumbnail3CopyExif", "true");
Edited by user Friday, February 22, 2008 1:43:22 PM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 8/3/2003(UTC)
Posts: 998
|
Hello, Image Uploader for Java and Image Uploader for ActiveX are completely different programs. Java version is based on standard Java libraries while ActiveX version is based on a set of libraries written on C++ so result images could differ in file size. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aurigma Forums
»
Legacy Products
»
Archive
»
Image Uploader
»
Does anybody know why files are compressed more in Java vs. ActiveX
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.