Aurigma Forums
»
Upload Suite
»
Discussions – ActiveX/Java Uploader
»
Bad upload java speed performance vs good for activex
Rank: Newbie
Groups: Member
Joined: 11/28/2008(UTC)
Posts: 4
|
Why max speed upload is very bad with java VS good with activeX ?
I tested under windows XP and Debian with 5.5 image uploader and the problem is the same.
Because with java uploader conccurent solution, I have not this bad limitation speed with java when I upload big file with very good connexion to internet.
And why upload Java is verry verry slow when I configure SilentMode=true and addEventListener Progress to display my progressbar with HTML ?
Why did you not added parameter interval time for EventListener Progress between call function progress ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member, Administration, Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2003(UTC)
Posts: 1,070
Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 12 time(s) in 12 post(s)
|
Hello,
Actually Image Uploader Java and Image Uploader ActiveX are two different products based on different technologies. If you disable standard progress dialog and use a custom one, the bottle neck is LiveConnect. It is mechanism used to perform calls between Java and JavaScript. It works rather slow and that is why you experience these issues.
We are working on Image Uploader performance and we have done much since version 5.0. Your suggestion makes sense, we have it in our todo list. The interval between progress events will be increased in the next version.
Thank you for your suggestion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aurigma Forums
»
Upload Suite
»
Discussions – ActiveX/Java Uploader
»
Bad upload java speed performance vs good for activex
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.